Authors: Marcel Nienhuis, Sam Peterson
During a rain filled week in Paris this May, The European Society of Thoracic Imaging ("ESTI" for short) and the Fleischner Society held their joint annual meeting. VIDA was pleased to be an exhibitor at the event as it gave us an opportunity for discussions with many of the world's leading thoracic radiologists and researchers. We also absorbed a great deal from the lectures. Outside the conference halls, we were equally productive, attempting to eat our body weight in crepes. Here are some highlights we took away from Paris:
AI--specifically machine learning--was one of the leading topics at ESTI. Dr. Eliot Siegel gave an entertaining and informative keynote on the topic. One of his remarks that stuck with us is the distinction between two questions:
A. "What's in this picture?"
B. "What's wrong with this picture?"
Machine learning applications are excellent at question A (what's in a picture), but not equipped to answer question B (what's wrong with a picture). In the example below (borrowed from Dr. Siegel's lecture), we see a duck watching TV on the roof. A human can apply judgement and experience to identify that situation as "wrong" or "odd," while an AI application might merely tell us that a TV exists in this image.
One can see how this analogy applies to medical image interpretation. AI can assist by flagging areas of interest and identifying features, but a radiologist is necessary to apply judgement and assess the context.
ILD was a hot topic with several dedicated lecture blocks. Since ILD is often diagnosed late and/or incorrectly, providers are hungry to catch it earlier. Of particular interest is the identification of UIP vs. NSIP, a key aspect in the diagnosis of IPF. The subjectivity often associated with this distinction makes it an area where machine learning can have a significant impact.
The were quite a few talks on lung cancer screening, covering programs and trials all over the world. The most striking takeaways for us were the following challenges, none of which are technical issues:
We were delighted to see several speakers discuss the importance of CT scan quality in the context of quantitative CT (QCT) and machine learning. For example:
VIDA has always been passionate about the subject of standardized CT protocols for QCT. We will share many more thoughts in a future post.
On the final day of ESTI, the audience was treated to a surprise cheerleading performance by some local medical students. It was certainly a sharp contrast to the scientific presentations that preceded. Here's a taste:
We ate a lot of crepes during our time in Paris. Since we are a quantitative company, here are a few stats:
Most importantly, 2 out of 2 VIDA employees agree that lemon + sugar + butter is the best possible crepe filling.
In conclusion, ESTI 2019 was an excellent event. We'll be back in 2020, this time in Oxford.
-end-